House Committee on Agriculture To Review Horticulture Priorities for the 2013 Farm Bill

From the House Committee on Agriculture

Wednesday, April 24, 2013 – 10:00 a.m.
1300 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, D.C.
Subcommittee on Horticulture, Research, Biotechnology, and Foreign Agriculture – Public Hearing
RE: To Review Horticulture Priorities for the 2013 Farm Bill

Witnesses

Panel 1

  • Ms. Sarah M. Frey-Talley, President and CEO, Frey Farms, Keenes, Illinois
  • Mr. William L. Brim, President and Owner, Lewis & Taylor Farms, Inc., Tifton, Georgia
  • Mr. Barry Bushue, Vice President, American Farm Bureau Federation, President, Oregon Farm Bureau Federation, Boring, Oregon

Click here for more information and to webcast the hearing.


Conservation Stewardship Program Funding Fixed

Cross-posted from Center for Rural Affairs

By Traci Bruckner

The Center for Rural Affairs Farm Bill Helpline is ready to assist farmers and ranchers to take advantage of one of the nation’s best conservation programs.

Farmers and ranchers will again be able to apply for the Conservation Stewardship Program. CSP rewards producers for conservation practices on working lands. Funding for enrollments was accidentally cut off in the government spending bill passed last October. Congress recently passed legislation to fix that right before their Easter recess.

The legislation removes the remaining obstacles to CSP sign-up this year. It is a welcome move, as farmers and ranchers have been waiting to sign up. Each year more apply than can receive contracts, nearly twice as many.

USDA can now proceed with enrolling just over 11 million acres of farm and ranch land. This will bring the program to a grand total of 62 million acres by year’s end. The fix came in a bill to continue funding for the federal government for the next six months. We’ve pressed for this result since last October when the first government funding bill accidentally shut off CSP enrollment for 2013.

Potential applicants, move forward now, before planting season is underway and you get too busy in the field to get away. CSP is a continuous signup program, so producers can apply to enroll at any time of year. But USDA applies a cut-off date for applications to be considered during a particular fiscal year. Once the cut-off date is past, producers can continue to apply, but you won’t be considered for entry until the spring of the following year, in this case spring of 2014.

Click here to keep reading.


DEADLINE EXTENDED: Hispanic and Women Farmers and Ranchers Claims Must be Filed by MAY 1, 2013

Cross-posted from the United States Department of Agriculture

WASHINGTON, March 25, 2013- Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack today announced the extension of the voluntary claims process for Hispanic and women farmers and ranchers who allege discrimination by the USDA in past decades. All claims must now be filed by MAY 1, 2013.

“Hispanic and women farmers who believe they have faced discriminatory practices in the past from the USDA have additional time to file a claim in order to have a chance to receive a cash payment or loan forgiveness,” said Secretary Vilsack. “USDA urges potential claimants to contact the Claims Administrator for information and to file their claim packages on or before May 1, 2013.”

The process offers a voluntary alternative to litigation for each Hispanic or female farmer and rancher who can prove that USDA denied his or her application for loan or loan servicing assistance for discriminatory reasons for certain time periods between 1981 and 2000.

As announced in February 2011, the voluntary claims process will make available at least $1.33 billion for cash awards and tax relief payments, plus up to $160 million in farm debt relief, to eligible Hispanic and women farmers and ranchers. There are no filing fees to participate in the program.

Website: www.farmerclaims.gov
Phone: 1-888-508-4429
Fax: (855) 626-8343
Email: claims@hwfr.org
Claims Period: September 24, 2012 – May 1, 2013.

Click here for more information and the full posting.


Tell the Senate: America Depends on Our Nutrition Programs

Action Alert from the Public Health Institute

Wednesday the Senate Budget Committee is set to consider proposals that would slash billions from our country’s nutrition programs—reducing funding that provides SNAP (food stamps) to over 47 million Americans, and completely eliminating the nutrition education program SNAP-Ed. As budget conversations continue over the next few days, a proposal on the table from Senator Roberts, to slash $36 billion, is expected to be the first of many misdirected attempts to balance the budget by literally taking healthy foods off of people’s plates. The proposed cuts could go even higher, if we don’t stand up for nutrition programs today.

On the heels of last week’s devastating sequester cuts, we can’t afford to sever one of the most important safety nets for our poorest families. Cutting nutrition programs won’t reduce poverty, stop children from going hungry or provide resources that improve diets.

Please make a call today to the Senate Budget Committee and tell them to protect SNAP and SNAP-Ed from any cuts in Senator Roberts’ proposal, and in any future negotiations.

“Times are tough right now for millions of Americans,” Senator Roberts said when he introduced his bill—but cutting our nutrition programs won’t make things any easier. Today 15% of our nation lives below the poverty line, the highest proportion in a half century. They depend on SNAP, SNAP-Ed, and the emergency food assistance program for the resources, knowledge, and access to healthy foods that they need to prevent hunger and improve diets on tight budgets.

By protecting SNAP-Ed, we support programs like a Pennsylvania SNAP-Ed School Nutrition initiative that resulted in a 50% reduction in obesity among 4th and 5th graders. We support Harvest of the Month in Michigan and California, which links farmers, schools and grocery stores and increases the purchase and consumption of fruits and vegetables.

Click here to join PHI and nutrition advocates across the country. Make a call today to the Senate Budget Committee and tell them to protect SNAP and SNAP-Ed from any cuts—now and in future negotiations—and oppose Roberts’ proposal. (We’ve made it easy with phone numbers and suggested talking points.)

Thank you for your help.

Matthew Marsom
Vice President of Public Health Policy and Advocacy


Public Health Institute and California Project LEAN Applaud USDA Proposed Nutrition Standards for Foods Sold in Schools

Cross-posted from Public Health Institute

Joint Statement from Cyndi Guerra Walter, California Project LEAN, and Gabrielle Serra, Public Health Institute

“Public Health Institute (PHI) and California Project LEAN (Leaders Encouraging Activity and Nutrition) applaud the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) proposal, ‘Smart Snacks in Schools,’ to establish minimum nutrition standards for foods and beverages sold in schools.

“ ‘Smart Snacks in Schools’ is a significant step toward ensuring children across the nation have greater access to fruits, vegetables, whole grains, low-fat dairy, and  lean protein, and less access to sugar-sweetened beverages.

“These proposed standards are part of a comprehensive effort required by the Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010 to ensure that healthy food and beverages are available in schools for all children, whether they participate in the federally subsidized school meals or purchase foods and beverages from snack bars, student stores or vending machines.

“Good nutrition is a critical factor in promoting children’s health, and their success in and out of the classroom. Establishing minimum national nutrition standards for foods and beverages sold in schools is an important step to help ensure that healthy choices are the default option for our children. Research shows that competitive food and beverage standards can help reduce the risk for obesity-related chronic diseases. In California–where competitive food standards have been in place since 2007– high school students consumed fewer calories, less fat and less sugar at school than students in states with no competitive food standards in place.

“PHI and California Project LEAN look forward to working with USDA, states and local school districts to ensure the implementation of strong, science-based nutrition standards for foods and beverages sold in schools. We also underscore our commitment to support innovation and leadership in communities across the United States to establish and implement nutrition standards that go above and beyond the federal guidelines for foods and beverages sold outside the school meal programs to improve nutrition and prevent childhood obesity.”


Download the Web Forum “Ask the Experts: Is the Price Right?”

Understanding the economics of healthy food for consumers and farmers

On Thursday February 7, the Healthy Farms Healthy People Coalition hosted an “Ask the Experts” web forum in follow-up to an August web forum in which panelists explored how the price of food affects the health of consumers and economic viability of farmers. We brought back those same panelists to spend an hour answering audience questions about the economics of healthy food.

If you missed any of the web forum, it is now available to view or download here!

We’d like to thank our panelists for sharing their unique expertise and perspectives, and for an engaging and informative discussion on the price of food: Dr. Andrea Carlson from the USDA’s Economic Research Service, Dr. Chad Hellwinckel from the University of Tennessee at Knoxville and the Knoxville Food Policy Council, Dr. Jennifer Obadia of the Boston Collaborative for Food and Fitness, Alexa Delwiche of the Los Angeles Food Policy Council, and Michael O’Gorman of the Farmer Veteran Coalition.

The following reports were referenced during the web forum:

This Healthy Farms Healthy People web forum was organized by Coalition Steering Committee member ChangeLab Solutions and moderated by Christine Fry.

Stay tuned for details on our next forum.


Ask the Experts Web Forum: Is the Price Right? Understanding the economics of healthy food for consumers and farmers

Thursday, February 7, 11 AM PT/2 PM ET

Register here today!

Have a question about the price of healthy food that you’ve always wanted to ask an economist? Curious about ways to increase demand for farm products at a local level? Then this webinar is for you! It is a follow-up to Healthy Farms Healthy People’s August webinar, in which the panelists explored how the price of food affects the health of consumers and the economic viability of farmers. We are bringing back those same panelists to spend an hour answering your questions about the economics of healthy food.

We strongly encourage participants to watch the previous webinar on the price of healthy food before attending this webinar. The previous webinar will provide a quick grounding in the economics of healthy food and a few ways that organizations around the country are trying to make food affordable for consumers and economically viable for producers. Bring your questions about the previous webinar or healthy food pricing from the consumer or producer perspectives to the February 7 webinar. The entire discussion will be devoted to your questions!

Speakers:

Dr. Andrea Carlson is an economist with USDA’s Economic Research Service where her main areas of research include the economics of nutrition and organic foods. Last year, she released a report that examined whether healthy foods are more expensive than less healthy foods.

Dr. Chad Hellwinckel is a research assistant professor at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville, where he focuses on agricultural land use policies, climate change mitigation, biofuels analysis and defining appropriate long-term agricultural policy in a post peak-oil world. He is also a member of the Knoxville Food Policy Council.

Dr. Jennifer Obadia has worked with farmers markets in Massachusetts in various capacities over the years. She conducted her dissertation research on the efficacy of markets from the farmer and consumer perspectives. She has also provided technical assistance to market managers while working at the Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources. In 2011, she conducted an evaluation of the use of SNAP at Massachusetts farmers markets, including the impact of financial incentives for SNAP participants to purchase fruits and vegetables at farmers markets.

Alexa Delwiche is the Food Policy Coordinator for the Los Angeles Food Policy Council. In this capacity, she manages the large network of individuals working collaboratively to build a Good Food system for Southern California. Most recently, her work with the LAFPC has focused on developing and advancing the Good Food Purchasing Pledge and Guidelines for Food Service Institutions in partnership with a diverse group  - including labor and environmental organizations, businesses, school food service, public health advocates, and many more.

Michael O’Gorman has been a pioneering organic farmer for over forty years. The last twenty years he has been the production manager for some of the nation’s largest organic vegetable companies. Michael is the founder of the Farmer Veteran Coalition, where he helps farmers plan and operate economically-viable businesses.

This Healthy Farms Healthy People web forum is organized by Coalition Steering Committee member, ChangeLab Solutions, and will be moderated by Christine Fry.


A Dime A Day: What Can You Get for a Dime a Day? A Lot Actually

Cross-posted from the Food Chain Workers Alliance

Sign our petition on SignOn.org telling members of Congress that as a consumer, you’re willing to pay an extra dime a day so that 29 million workers can receive a much needed raise and they should support the Fair Minimum Wage Act. Read the blog post below to learn more!

By Saru Jayaraman and Joann Lo

Big Food companies and their lobbying groups have lied to us many times. They convinced Congress to include tomato paste on pizzas as a vegetable. They say we need industrial, chemical-laden agriculture to feed the world (check out Anna Lappé’s new video Food MythBusters to learn that we don’t). And Big Food has also spread the mythology that if the minimum wage is raised, food will become so expensive that none of us will be able to afford to eat out – or eat at all – again.

Yes, that’s a lie! On this Food Day 2012, our organizations are releasing a new report, A Dime a Day: The Impact of the Miller/Harkin Minimum Wage Proposal on the Price of Food. The proposed Fair Minimum Wage Act, introduced this year by Representative George Miller (D-CA) in the House and Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) in the Senate would raise the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $9.80 per hour over the next 3 years and the tipped minimum wage from $2.13 to 70% of the regular minimum wage.

We found that this increase in the regular minimum wage and the tipped minimum wage would have a minuscule impact on food costs. Even if the entire cost of increased wages is passed on to consumers, grocery store prices would rise, on average, less than half of 1 percent over the three-year phase-in of the new minimum wage and restaurant food prices would also increase by less than one percent per year. This would mean a $0.45 increase on a $20 restaurant bill over three years.

Click here to keep reading.


Nine State Meetings: bring health and agriculture sectors together for food system change

By Jennifer Billig, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy & HFHP Steering Committee

One of the major initiatives of the Healthy Farms, Healthy People Coalition in 2012 was helping bring together cross-sector meetings in nine states, including Minnesota, Texas, Illinois, Montana, Oregon, New York, Kansas, Mississippi and Iowa. While the purpose of the meetings was to begin building bridges between the health and agriculture sectors,  many of the meetings included representatives from the anti-hunger, culinary and philanthropic sectors, among others, as well.

The nine state meetings mirrored the national health-agriculture convening hosted by the coalition in May 2011 in Washington, DC. Participants across all the meetings were energized by the opportunity to learn about key issues from new perspectives and the prospect of new partnerships between the health and farming communities. The hope is that working across sectors will bring more innovative food system policy to support public health goals for healthier eating, but also support our farmers’ ability to make a living producing fruits, vegetables, commodity crops such as wheat and rice, as well as food animals that serve those goals.

The coalition provided financial support for seven of the nine one-day meetings via a competitive application process that produced 61 proposals. The Minnesota and Illinois meetings also received support from local funders. The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP) provided technical assistance for all nine meetings on a state-by-state basis, as well as by working with the National Network of Public Health Institutes to convene state meeting organizers to share ideas.

The year kicked off in Minnesota with a meeting in early January and ended with meetings in Iowa and Kansas in mid-November. The meetings ranged in size from 42 participants in the less populated state of Montana to more than 335 participants in Minnesota, with most of the remaining meetings engaging approximately 75-100 health and agriculture stakeholders.

More than one of the meetings opened with a panel of speakers sharing their diverse perspectives on key food system issues. Others opened with a keynote speakers, including Dr. Kelly Brownell of Yale’s Rudd Center who spoke to the Minnesota audience about the need to make healthy food the “optimal default” through policy and environment changes; Bob Martin, senior policy advisor at the Center for a Livable Future at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health made the case to the Kansas audience for a public health perspective on agriculture, particularly the linkages between the growing number of human antibiotic-resistant infections and the widespread use of antibiotics in animal agriculture; and Ken Meter of Crossroads Resource Center described the political economy of the food system in central Illinois and outlined an opportunity to reverse the trend of food and farm dollars flowing out of the region to distant corporations rather than supporting local producers and businesses.

Discussion of local and regional food system issues were prominent at all the meetings, from the Mississippi meeting which focused on building farm to institution programs in the state, to New York where food business owners participated in discussions about ways to expand consumer access to state products. In Oregon, a state law prohibiting undocumented workers from having driver’s licenses threatens to hurt local farms and food businesses across the state, as well as worsen poverty among that population of workers and their families.

Other key issues discussed included the need for better public incentives and crop insurance for producers of fruits and vegetables, the need for scale-appropriate food safety laws that support development of local food systems, the need to reform state procurement laws to allow for more local sourcing and increasing access to federal nutrition programs at farmers markets.

It is our hope that work will continue on these and other key policy issues within the states and through creation of a national community of practice made up of leaders from each of the nine states, as well as additional states that hold cross-sector meetings in 2013. A multi-year community of practice would allow for shared learning about key issues and foster policy development in multiple states, as well as drive creation of healthier national food and farming systems policy.


Secretary’s Column: The Importance of a Strong Safety Net

Cross-posted from the United States Department of Agriculture

By Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack

At the beginning of this New Year, we at USDA are redoubling our efforts to achieve an adequate, defensible safety net for producers, more economic opportunity through the biobased economy, safe and nutritious food for Americans, robust efforts to carry out research and greater conservation of our natural resources.

To further our efforts in these areas, I hope to work with Congress this year to secure passage of a comprehensive, multiyear Food, Farm and Jobs Bill.

One very important part of a Food, Farm and Jobs Bill is to provide a safety net for America’s producers, who face a great deal of uncertainty in their work – both from Mother Nature and market prices. Historically, the Farm Bill authorizes USDA to provide disaster assistance for producers and step in with help when they face volatile markets.

For example, prior to the expiration of the 2008 Farm Bill disaster programs, USDA was able to provide more than 400,000 disaster payments totaling more than $4 billion in assistance. In fact, had the programs not previously expired, we would have been able to provide an estimated $500 million dollars in additional help for drought-impacted livestock producers in 2012.

This safety net assistance helps our farmers and ranchers focus on growing more for our nation – and it ensures that farm families have somewhere to turn when the going is especially tough.

But the importance of these programs doesn’t stop at the edge of the farm field. A strong agriculture sector impacts every American. American agriculture provides more than 80 percent of our food supply here at home. Our prosperity enables the U.S. to export billions of dollars worth of agricultural products around the world, supporting more than one million jobs. Our productivity means that American families pay less for their food at the grocery store than the people of any developed nation.

One in 12 jobs is related to agriculture – including in our biggest cities. When the business of agriculture is thriving, more jobs are created in transportation, packaging, processing and sales. And when farmers and ranchers are successful, they invest in their operation, spurring manufacturing and greater business opportunity.

At USDA we are committed to doing everything we can to support a thriving agriculture sector. Unfortunately, without a comprehensive, multiyear Food, Farm and Jobs Bill, it’s tougher to provide a smart and defensible safety net. This isn’t just critical for farmers – it’s important for every American. That’s why I’ll continue to work with Congress over the coming year to secure a five year Food, Farm and Jobs Bill that will give our producers the tools they need to grow and thrive.

Click here for the original post.